May 2009

F1 2009: The Story So Far

By: Adam Elliott

The 2009 Formula 1 season began just two weeks after the end of the 2008 season with the first test session of the year.

However, it wasn’t until December 2008 that the season became interesting with the shock announcement that Honda was due to leave Formula 1 because of the worldwide recession taking its toll on the business.

Following several discussions in January, the final lineup for 2009 was confirmed as:

  • Ferrari – Raikkonen/Massa
  • McLaren-Mercedes – Hamilton/Kovalainen
  • BMW Sauber – Kubica/Heidfeld
  • Renault – Alonso/Piquet Jr
  • Toyota – Glock/Trulli
  • Toro Rosso-Ferrari – Bourdais/Buemi
  • Red Bull-Renault – Webber/Vettel
  • Williams-Toyota – Rosberg/Nakajima
  • Force India-Mercedes – Sutil/Fisichella
  • Brawn-Mercedes – Button/Barrichello
  • New rules and new tyres were introduced at the start of the season leading to the major teams having to design drastically different cars with new body styling. The ability to cope with the return to slicks was something all teams had to deal with.

    The biggest technical change was the introduction of KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery System), meaning that the teams were all facing a new technical challenge and that would ultimately lead to a major decision for the weight/power argument.

    The FIA made their first biggest intervention of the season, the decision to introduce a rule change meaning the driver who won the most races would become the World Champion—this was quickly rescinded after FOTA (Formula One Teams Association) voiced their opposition.

    The pre-season testing had been limiting the use for establishing the quickest teams so far. Many teams were opting to use revised versions of their 2008 cars with new parts at various sessions.

    It wasn’t until March 9 that all teams produced their 2009 cars at the Barcelona test.

    Here the first glimpse of the season started to become clear. Ross Brawn showed his technical ability had carried over into his newly purchased, and former Honda, team.

    McLaren also showed their difficulties with the car, consistently being considerably slower than the majority of the pack. Brawn were the biggest surprise, topping the time charts on numerous occasions.

    March also saw the start of the first major debate of the year: the rear diffuser!

    Williams, Toyota, and Brawn all operated with a “double” rear diffuser which became the subject of numerous appeals by the remaining seven teams.

    Brawn, led by Button, took the weekend opening weekend in Melbourne by storm, living up to his pre-season promise, as he secured both the pole and race victory, and was followed by his teammate Barrichello.

    Toyota followed then Renault with the remainder of the field coming in behind. The Ferrari team was disappointingly slow, with Massa retiring and Raikkonen being classified as 15th despite failing to reach the chequered flag.

    Hamilton was disqualified from the race in a scandal which saw Hamilton accused of lying and it ultimately cost Ron Dennis his job with the F1 side of the business.

    Button continued his dominance at the second race of the year taking the pole and race victory for the second straight time. Ferrari and McLaren struggled with only Hamilton managing to secure points for seventh. Toyota continued to lead the chase of the Brawn’s while the BMW of Heidfeld showed the desire to compete by finishing on the podium in second.

    Following Malaysia, F1 made a brief stop over in Paris (no cars were there, just lawyers and suits). Here Brawn, Toyota, and Williams were declared to be legal following challenges to the rear diffusers. The seven remaining teams found themselves playing catch up in the design race as well as on the track as the season was already well underway.

    So on to China and race three. This time Vettel stuck his Red Bull on the pole and by the end of the race, Vettel remained up front followed by his teammate, Mark Webber. Brawn brought up third and fourth and Kovalainen secured his only point of the season so far. Hamilton, Ferrari, and Trulli were disappointments in the third race of the season.

    Bahrain was the place for the fourth race of the year and saw a return to the Brawn show as Button came out the clear winner for the third time this season. Vettel continued to demonstrate that his team was getting close to Brawn with a second place while Ferrari finally managed to get their first points of the season with a sixth place finish for Raikkonen. Hamilton managed his best finish of the season with a fourth.

    Spain marked the fifth race and Barrichello’s attempted to take the spotlight from Button and Barrichello actually got the jump on Button and had the stronger strategy during the opening of the race.

    However, Button’s pace and change of tactics handed him his fourth race victory. Red Bull continued to chase and Ferrari scored more points with Massa claiming his first points—although a lack of reliability saw Raikkonen retire. Hamilton again failed to score and Kovalainen suffered his third retirement of the year.

    Monaco was the most recent race to date.

    Brawn again showed its power. Button’s last minute qualifying lap saw him snatch the pole and he stayed up front all race once again in capturing the victory in beautiful Monaco.

    Barrichello again was the wing man for Button. Massa and Raikkonen showed Ferrari’s continued development by capturing points, although Massa still placed behind Webber. Hamilton was out of the points after crashing in qualifying and starting from the back of the pack.

    So in summary, both on and off track in 2009, it has been an enthralling season.

    As for what will happen for the rest of the season and beyond is a complete unknown. The Ferrari team is definitely improving, but they have to match the very quick Red Bull and the seemingly reliable and dominating Brawn. McLaren are miles behind and Renault might be considering a driver change, among other things.

    All that being said though, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Force India score a race win and see Piquet challenge for the top of the points. After all, as the great Murray Walker always said, “F1 is backwards!”

    However, it’s really Button and Brawn’s season to lose at this point.

    Source: bleacherreport.com

    Read more

    Driver in Focus: Kimi Räikkönen

    Kimi Raikkonen

    The Development Years

    Kimi Raikkonen was born on the 17th of October 1979 in Espoo, Finland..

    The 30 year old Kimi Raikkonen started out racing like every other F1 driver, which was karting. He began training at the age of 10. In the kart that he raced, it was obvious that he was a very talented driver. He continued karting and competing and found several successes in the Finnish Series.

    Success Beckons

    In 2000, Peter Sauber extended the olive branch and gave him a test with the Sauber Formula One team in September at the Mugello Circuit. He did so well that it lead to a contract for 2001. Sauber said: “I knew Kimi was fast from his first test at Mugello and after three races I knew he was very ralented, extremely focused and also egotistical. He thinks he is quicker than anybody. All these things add up to him being a good racing driver, although not necessarily a nice one. He was concentrated only on his own success.”

    Read more

    Driver In Focus: Jensen Button

    Tuesday, 19th May 2009

    Jensen Button

    The Development Years

    Jensen Alexander Lyons Button was born on the 19th of January 1980 in Frome, Somerset.

    The 29 year old Jenson Button is the son of a former racecar driver himself, John Button. Jensen Button started out racing like every other F1 driver, which was karting. He began training at the age of eight. In a kart bought by his father, Button was a natural talent. In his maiden debut in karting, he won the 1991 British Cadet Kart Championship. He did it amazingly by winning straight all the 34 races.

    Jensen Button continued to race in the karting circle for a few more years before winning the European Super A Championship in 1997 which got him noticed and earned a place in the British Formula Ford Championship with Haywood Racing.

    Read more

    F1 without Ferrari? Surely Not…

    By: Dan Lowe

    Its inconceivable isn’t it?  In many ways, Ferrari is F1; the prestigious team to ever compete in the championship; the oldest team to compete in the championship and the most successful F1 team of all time.

    Yet, come 2010, it could well be ‘arrivederci’ from the boys in Maranello.

    Could it really happen?  Well from the vibes coming from Luca di Montezemolo and his fellow board members really do seem to be a serious, genuine threat that they really could pull the plug on their ultra-successful operation.

    You can’t get more blunt than “If the regulations for 2010 will not change, then Ferrari does not intend to enter cars in the next Formula 1 world championship.”

    What could be key however from that statement its “does not intend.”  Of course, their are a few weeks to go before the official deadline for 2010 entries to be formalised, but with the new budget cap and the new “two-tier” being so universally disliked, its surely only a matter of time before Max Mosley has to reconsider his proposal.

    The “two-tier” part of the proposal does to me seem to be the major sticking point.  It really would make a mockery of the championship, with almost two completely different formulae racing round circuits across the globe every fortnight.

    Of course, this helps teams such as Force India, Brawn GP, and Williams who could easily adapt to low-budget formulae, but if it results in teams like McLaren, Toyota, and BMW being “forced” to race around at the back for more money as they would have great difficulty in being able to adapt to the new budget cap in such a short amount of time; they’d be no point in them racing.

    Whats more to consider, is that the best drivers in F1 always end up racing for the best teams.

    The best drivers are always the best paid, some as much as £20-30million a year, so how on earth would teams like Brawn GP be able to afford partnering a Button with an Alonso, or Force India partnering a Massa with a Hamilton?  They can’t (unless the drivers take substantial pay-cuts).

    Surely therefore we will not only see a vast withdrawal of teams, but also the departure of some of the worlds best drivers, who, a) wouldn’t want to race around at the back, and b) couldn’t be employed by the new “front runners” as their pay packets would be out of their reach.

    Returning to Ferrari though; if they were to pull out, it would see the loss of the greatest team to ever enter the sport.

    The team that for the best part in the 1980s and early 1990s was a laughing stock, creating cars that would be brilliant over one lap, and then explode into a million pieces the next, would be consigned to the history books and the nostalgic fan.

    The team that Schumacher, Ascari, Villeneuve, Prost, Lauda, Mansell, Pironi, and Scheckter have raced for, would be gone. The team with 15 constructors championship and 16 driver championships would be no more. It would be like Manchester United or Real Madrid pulling the plug on their football teams.

    Are they right to be so against a budget cap?  No, F1 has become to expensive and it does need to be cut back. But are they right to be against the ‘two-tier’ solution? Yes, of course they are. Surely the FIA can consider a new approach?

    Maybe stagnant the budget cap over the next few years, so teams can adapt to the new system rather than chop and change everything in little over a year.

    Maybe teams that stay within the budget cap could be allowed to run a third driver on a Friday or teams who go over the budget cap could have their out of season and in season testing severely limited.

    The “two-tier” system would make a mockery of the F1 brand.  But even so, will Ferrari go ahead with their threat? Surely not…?

    All you can do is to wait for the 2010 season or another announcement from the FIA to know for sure.

    Read more

    Lessons for F1 in NASCAR’s horror crash

    By Keith Collantine

    Carl Edwards’ crash in the closing stages of last weekend’s NASCAR race at Talladega has sparked debate among racing fans:
    Was this just a freak accident in a championship that engineers crashes for the entertainment of its fans – or are there lessons here for Formula 1 too?
    Racing for the lead with the chequered flag in sight, Edwards was tipped into a spin by rival Brad Keselowski, then launched in a terrifying flip by the onrushing car of Ryan Newman. The only thing keeping the 99 car from landing in the crowd was a row of safety fencing, and despite that seven fans were injured by a shower of debris.
    F1 and NASCAR are as different as two motor sports can be. So it’s tempting to conclude that F1 could never see something similar to Edwards’ crash: the cars don’t race so close to each other, and there is much more run-off between the track and the spectators.

    Perhaps. But the welcome sight this year of cars being able to race each other more closely raises the possibility of such a crash happening in F1 – consider Robert Kubica and Jarno Trulli’s collision at Shanghai.
    And Bernie Ecclestone is increasingly keen on adding street races to the calendar. Again, this is no bad thing, as it may allow spectators to get closer to the action – but that brings an obvious added danger.
    Among NASCAR commentators reaction to the crash has centred on the wisdom of allowing drivers to ‘block’ (i.e. defend) their position.

    This has occasionally been a cause of concern in F1 as well, with driver being allowed to get away with some manoeuvres that seem exceptionally dangerous – Michael Schumacher’s infamous swerve at

    Mika Hakkinen at Spa in 2000 being an especially infamous example.
    When the FIA is so preoccupied with improving safety by cutting cornering speeds and neutering circuits, it defies belief when drivers are allowed to go unpunished for such actions.

    But in NASCAR’s case I don’t think driving standards is the real culprit. This crash again questions the wisdom of ‘restrictor plate racing’. These devices are mandated by NASCAR at larger ovals like Talladega and Daytona to limit speeds but also guarantee the racing pack remains close.
    The Talladega race has spawned a cult following among fans eager to witness ‘The Big One’ – a huge multi-car collision that inevitably occurs, often involving dozens of cars. But this time it was fans that paid the price – and had Edwards’ car gone a metre or two one way or another the carnage might have been unimaginable.
    Since Ayrton Senna’s death 15 years ago today, F1 has seized every opportunity to examine and improve its safety preparations. It’s important that includes observing how other motor sports handle major accidents like this, and how well their safety procedures coped.
    Had NASCAR taken note of lessons learned by rival championships a decade ago, it might not have lost one of its most famous drivers, Dale Earnhardt, in a last-lap crash at Daytona 2001.
    Perhaps the Edwards crash couldn’t happen in F1. But safety isn’t about leaving things to chance.

    Source: http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk

    Read more